翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Mandingo Sex Addict ・ Mandingo Wars ・ Mandingring ・ Mandeville School ・ Mandeville School, Aylesbury ・ Mandeville Site ・ Mandeville Sports Centre ・ Mandeville's paradox ・ Mandeville, Arkansas ・ Mandeville, Eure ・ Mandeville, Jamaica ・ Mandeville, Louisiana ・ Mandeville, New Zealand ・ Mandeville, Quebec ・ Mandeville, West Virginia ・ Mandeville-Anthony v. Walt Disney Co. ・ Mandeville-en-Bessin ・ Mandewa ・ Mandgelis Document ・ Mandhal ・ Mandhana ・ Mandhana Industries ・ Mandhana Junction railway station ・ Mandhana, Bhiwani ・ Mandhana, Kanpur ・ Mandhara ・ Mandhata ・ Mandhata Singh ・ Mandhata, Uttar Pradesh ・ Mandhatri Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Mandeville-Anthony v. Walt Disney Co. ： ウィキペディア英語版 Mandeville-Anthony v. Walt Disney Co. ''Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company'', 11-56441 (9th Cir. 2012), is a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case in which the Court evaluated whether defendants Pixar, The Walt Disney Company and Walt Disney Pictures infringed on Jake Mandeville-Anthony's copyrighted works. Plaintiff Mandeville-Anthony's claim for copyright infringement was first dismissed by the United States District Court for the Central District of California, because the court found that the parties’ works were not substantially similar.〔(【引用サイトリンク】author=Keshishian, Milord A. )〕 Mandeville-Anthony made copyright infringement claims with regards to his works ''Cookie & Co.'' and ''Cars/Auto-Excess/Cars Chaos'', an animated television show and movie, that he believed Disney copied in order to make their own films, ''Cars'' and ''Cars 2'', both of which were very successful, and animation television show ''Cars Toons: Mater's Tall Tales''. He also made breach of contract claims stating that he and Disney signed a contract barring Disney from using the ideas contained in his works. The decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. == Facts and procedural history == In 2006, The Walt Disney Company released an award-winning movie called ''Cars'', based on a story about a car racer who, through his journey of car racing turned from a hotshot racecar that was arrogant to one who learned about the true meaning of love, friendship, family and life. Five years later, Jake Mandeville-Anthony filed a complaint that Disney's works ''Cars'', ''Cars 2'', and ''Cars Toons: Mater's Tall Tales'', the television animation series released shortly after, infringed on his copyrighted works ''Cookie'' and ''Cars Chaos''. ''Cookie'' was a story of two eccentric businessmen who won a vintage car endurance rally from London to Sydney, winning the race. ''Cars Chaos'' was a television series which contained general ideas in its script about a fast, good looking car that would race in different parts of the world.〔(Civil Minutes ), Jake Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company, et al., No. CV 11-2137 VBF (JEMx) 2011 U.S. Dist. (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2011).〕 Mandeville-Anthony also claimed that, before the making of ''Cars'', he signed a contract with Disney which barred Disney for two years from using his ideas from ''Cookie'' and ''Cars Chaos'' in their own works. On June 6, 2011, United States District Court for the Central District of California denied The Walt Disney Company's request that its film Cars 2 not be reviewed for discovery for the purposes of commercial secrecy and threat of piracy, and ordered the defendants to immediately produce the screenplay/script and an audio-visual copy of ''Cars 2.'' It also ruled that the plaintiff showed a justified need for the film and actual harm if he did not receive a copy of it, because without it he would not be able to bring a preliminary injunction motion without it. Moreover, due to the dissimilarity between the plots, producing a copy of their film and screenplay/script would not result in any harm to the defendants.〔(Motion for Discovery ), Jake Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company, et al., No. CV 11-2137 VBF (JEMx) 2011 U.S. Dist. (C.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2011).〕 Disney therefore provided copies of ''Cookie & Co.'', ''Cars/Auto-Excess/Cars Chaos'', a DVD copy of the motion picture ''Cars'', and a DVD copy of animated shorts for ''CARS Toon: Mater's Tall Tales'' for the District Court's review.〔(Support of Defendant's Motion for Judgment on Pleadings ), Jake Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company, et al., No. CV 11-2137 VBF (JEMx) 2011 U.S. Dist. (C.D. Cal. Jul. 25, 2011).〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Mandeville-Anthony v. Walt Disney Co.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.